WINOL
This week, like every other week so far
this semester, was cutting close to the 3 o’clock deadline. Luckily
we're all used to this mayhem and managed to go live in time. The
script was in very close to three and meant that the presenter had
little time to go through the script. But Luckily packages were in
with enough time to be checked over on the VT machine and any
problems were dealt with in time.
The only issue that delayed the team
slightly was the radio studio being down in the early part of the day
and so packages were later than we would've liked.
The bulletin itself went well and there
were no major issues, other than a few black holes coming out of VTs.
We did have to to re-record one of the links because the script on
the auto-cue wasn’t the same as the edited one on the paper script.
Diane James interview
Nadine had arranged an in studio
interview with UKIP member Diane James, which required the help of
the production team. The studio was set up differently to how WINOL
is filmed and we didn't use the green screen.
The first of the issues we faced with
the studio was that the main camera was out of focus. This made the
entire shot soft and facial features etc. were not defined. We were
unable to come up with a solution before the interview and so we made
the decision not to use the main camera (which had been set up as an
establishing shot of Nadine and Diane James).
To top this off the lighting in the
studio was quite bad. This was because we moved the set up for
interview into the corner of the studio, which was directly under the
main florescent lights. Even when we used a lighting kit and/or
turned the house lights off the image in the gallery wasn’t great,
though in the end we managed to get a decently lit set up.
Throughout the interview myself and
Nicole were in the gallery, watching the sound levels and vision
mixing live. With only two cameras being used I felt the interview
looked a little rigid, but because of the way the shots were framed
it worked well for the purpose. Mixing was a little easier than for
the COMPASS meeting because there was one less camera but also
because it was easy to judge when a question was going to be answered
and when Diane would respond.