The rise of science;
Science
distinguishes the modern world of philosophy, as it triumphed in the
seventeenth century, and highlighted a number of clashes within the ideas of
many – for example Plato and Aristotle could not have agreed with the
scientific ideas of newton. In order to grasp the mental atmosphere of the
time, the method and results of astronomy and physics must be understood.
Four great men of modern science;
Copernicus,
Kepler, Galileo and Newton are considered to be the pre-eminent creators of
science. The first three creating grounds for Newton’s law of motion.
Copernicus
-
was
early to believe that the sun was at the centre of the universe and that the
earth has twofold motion – diurnal rotation and annual revolution of the sun.
-
His
ideas can be described as Pythagorean – he believed axiomatic that all
celestial movement is circular and uniform and was influenced by aesthetics.
-
Protested
the idea that his ideas were a contradiction of the bible.
Difficulties of his theory;
-
The
absence of a stellar parallax – if the earth is so many miles away from where
it would be in six months, there ought to be a shift in the position of the
stars – no parallax was observed during this time and caused difficulties.
-
Falling
bodies and velocity – a falling body ought to fall directly below but because
of the movement of the earth it doesn’t.
-
At
the time it was believed that there are no known facts which compelled his
system, but there were actually several against it.
He is said
to have held two merits of the modern scientific philosopher – patients in
observation and great boldness in framing a hypothesis.
New
astronomy also held merits – there was recognition that ancient beliefs could
actually be untrue. Testing scientific truth is a patient collector of facts,
combined with guessing the laws binding the facts together. These are present
in Copernicus’ work and have been further developed since by successors.
Kepler;
-
Adopted
a heliocentric theory, but he used Tycho brache’s data to form his ideas
differently to Copernicus, which showed it could not be quite right in that
form.
-
He
followed the ideas of Plato’s ‘timaeus’ suppose cosmic significance must attach
to the five regular solids.
-
His
greatest achievement was discovering his three laws of planetary motion.
-
The
first law, the planets describe elliptic orbits of which the sun occupies one
focus.
-
The
second law, the line joining a planet to the sun sweeps out equal areas in
equal times.
-
The
third law, the square of the period of revolution of a planet is proportional
to the cube of its average distance from the sun.
Though at
the time only two of the three laws could be proven because of mars – the observations
were compatible with other planets but there nothing to establish them
definitely.
The first
law required greater effort of emancipation from tradition. Astronomers agreed all
celestial movements were all circular. Where circles were to be inadequate to
explain planetary movements epicycles were used.
The second
law deals with the varying velocity of the planet at different points of orbit.
The planet moves fastest when its nearest to the sun and slowest when its
farthest from it.
The third
deals with different planets, all together.
Galileo;
Galileo discovered
the importance of acceleration in dynamics. He was against the view that
everybody would move in a straight line with uniform velocity – change is
explained as due to the action of some force. This idea was taken on by Newton
as the first law of motion.
He was first
to establish the law of falling bodies – when a body is falling freely its
acceleration is constant, except in so far as resistance of the air may
interfere. The acceleration is the same for all bodies.
He proved
that there is no measureable difference between large and small lumps of the
same substance. A body falling freely in a vacuum has a constant rate of
velocity.
Newton;
With his three
laws, he proved that Keplers three laws are equivalent to the proposition that
every planet at every moment has acceleration toward the sun, which varies on the
square distance of the sun. This explains the motion of the moon when the earth
and sun are considered. The acceleration of falling bodies is related to the
moon according to the inverse square law.
No comments:
Post a Comment